There are more articles about dollar dominance right now than there are buyers of it. Everyone has a take. Most of them are either panicking or dismissing.
Here’s what’s actually happening.
The numbers don’t lie, but they don’t tell the whole story either
The DXY index sits at roughly 98 as of mid-April 2026, down about 1.45% over the past year and nearly 10% on a broad trade-weighted basis since the start of Trump’s second term.
But the downfall hasn’t been gradual. It has come in sudden, sharp drops that are technically unusual for a currency with daily transaction volumes so massive that violent moves should be nearly impossible.
April 2025’s tariff chaos was one. January 2026’s Greenland escalation was another.
The kind of currency that moves like that is a currency whose credibility is being actively tested.
On the inflation side, March CPI printed at 3.3% year-on-year, the highest reading since May 2024, driven largely by the energy shock following the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
Then, just last week, PPI came in at 0.5% month-on-month against a 1.2% consensus, with core PPI at 0.1% versus an expected 0.6%. That is a significant miss.
Upstream pricing pressure, the pipeline that feeds future consumer inflation, is not building the way the hawks warned.
EUR/USD is now above 1.18, Bitcoin cleared $74,000, and the safe-haven bid that briefly pushed DXY above 100 in March has almost fully unwound.
Two pillars holding the dollar up are both cracking at once
For the past several weeks, two things kept the dollar from falling further. The first was safe-haven demand from the Iran conflict.
The second was the fear that oil-driven inflation would force the Federal Reserve to hike rates, which would widen rate differentials in the dollar’s favour.
Both are now softening simultaneously, and that matters more than any single data point.
VP Vance cited “significant progress” in the first round of Iran talks in Pakistan, although no deal has been made.
A second round is expected before the ceasefire expires. If diplomacy holds, oil comes down, inflation expectations ease, and the case for keeping rates high weakens fast.
The Fed held at 3.50% to 3.75% at its March meeting, projecting one cut this year, although that projection was made before the soft PPI print. The
Rate cut expectations are now being quietly pulled forward, and every basis point of expected easing is a headwind for the dollar against the euro, the yen, and the pound.
Jerome Powell’s term expires on May 15.
A new Fed chair, expected to be Kevin Warsh, introduces a layer of institutional uncertainty that reserve managers, who are not known for taking unnecessary risks, will not ignore.
De-dollarisation is real
The dollar’s share of global foreign exchange reserves has fallen from 72% in 2001 to approximately 57% today, according to IMF COFER data.
That is a 15-percentage-point decline over 25 years.
However, Brookings research found that after stripping out valuation effects, meaning the mechanical reduction in dollar share that happens when the dollar simply falls in value, the active rotation away from the dollar among reserve managers has been far smaller than headline figures suggest.
The euro, the obvious beneficiary, has made essentially no inroads.
The real story is gold. Emerging market central banks, led by China, Russia, and Turkey, have more than doubled gold’s share of their reserves over the past decade, from 4% to over 9%, according to JP Morgan.
That is not a commodity trade.
That is a sovereign insurance policy against what Farrell and Newman, in their book “Underground Empire,” call weaponised interdependence: the US government’s demonstrated willingness to use dollar access as a geopolitical weapon.
When you freeze Russian reserves and cut Iran off from SWIFT, you do not just punish Russia and Iran.
You tell every non-allied sovereign on earth that dollar reserves are political assets, not neutral ones.
The rational response to that message is exactly what we are seeing.
So where does the dollar actually go from here?
Most institutional forecasters have the DXY settling in the low-to-mid 90s by year-end, assuming the Iran situation de-escalates, and the Fed returns to its cutting path.
A sustained move back above 103 would require either a full breakdown of the ceasefire or a material pivot toward rate hikes, neither of which is the base case right now.
China’s March trade data adds another wrinkle. Export growth came in at 2.5% year-on-year against forecasts of 8.6%, collapsing from 39.6% in February as tariff front-running reversed sharply.
A genuinely weakening Chinese export engine reduces global demand for dollar-denominated trade settlement and increases pressure on Beijing to stimulate domestically, which historically adds deflationary pressure to global goods prices.
That is ultimately disinflationary for the US, which gives the Fed more room to cut, which is dollar-negative.
The deeper insight is not about price levels. The dollar’s transactional dominance, the 89% of all FX transactions it sits on one side of, remains essentially uncontested.
No rival currency has the legal infrastructure, the market depth, or the institutional credibility to replace it at scale.
Ultimately, the dollar’s role as the world’s operating system is not eroding.
What is eroding is the automatic trust premium that came with it, the assumption that dollar assets are politically neutral, institutionally stable, and infinitely liquid regardless of geopolitical context.
That premium took decades to build. The bill for spending it so freely is starting to come due.
The post The Fed, Trump, and a crumbling trust premium — the dollar's perfect storm appeared first on Invezz
