US President Donald Trump is hinting that he might dust off the Insurrection Act, a law that’s been around since 1807, to send US military troops into cities like Chicago and Portland.
He is calling it a response to the unrest and insurrection linked to protests and clashes over his tough immigration enforcement policies.
This idea isn’t coming out of nowhere, as Trump’s faced a series of legal challenges that have slowed or blocked troop deployments in some states.
Still, he’s doubling down, insisting that the situation in certain cities is out of control, even as local officials strongly push back against the claim.
If he actually goes through with this, it would mark a major escalation, a dramatic step in using federal military power on American soil.
It also deepens the already tense standoff between Trump’s administration and Democratic-led states and cities over who gets to call the shots when it comes to public safety and federal authority.
What does the Insurrection Act say?
The Insurrection Act gives the president the power to send US military troops into American cities, but only under certain conditions, like when there’s an insurrection, rebellion, or when normal law enforcement can’t uphold federal laws.
In a way, it overrides the Posse Comitatus Act, which normally bars the military from getting involved in civilian law enforcement.
Usually, the president would need a request or consent from state governors before stepping in.
But here’s the catch: the law also lets the president act on his own if state or local leaders can’t keep order. That’s where things get controversial.
The Act hasn’t been used often; in fact, the last time was back in 1992 during the Los Angeles riots.
Right now, there is still a lot of legal debate over what actually counts as an “insurrection,” and any attempt to deploy troops in cities like Portland or Chicago is almost certain to face immediate court challenges.
Political fallout and public response
The idea of President Donald Trump invoking the Insurrection Act has set off a firestorm of criticism across the country. Governors, lawmakers, and civil rights groups are all pushing back hard.
Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker didn’t mince words; he called the idea of sending troops into cities an “invasion,” accusing the Trump administration of stirring up chaos just to justify using military force.
Officials in Chicago and Oregon have already taken legal steps to block any troop deployments, arguing that the unrest the president points to simply doesn’t meet the legal standard of an insurrection or rebellion.
Civil rights groups are also raising red flags, warning that militarizing domestic law enforcement could make things far worse, fueling violence, undermining public trust, and putting civil liberties at serious risk.
The post Trump eyes 200-year-old law to deploy troops in states: here’s what the act says appeared first on Invezz
